Truth

…As it turns out, there isn’t even anyone to be angry with; that there is no object to be found, and maybe never will be; that it’s all a sleight-of-hand, a stacked deck, a cheat, that it’s all just slops—nobody knows what and nobody knows who, but in spite of all the uncertainties and stacked decks, it still hurts, and the more uncertain you are, the more it hurts!

dostoyevsky:

11/11/11, Dostoyevsky’s 190th birthday.

Since on 11/11/11 I happen to be re-reading The Idiot, I’ll add:

‘Take a soldier, put him right in front of a cannon during a battle, and shoot at him, and he’ll keep hoping, but read that same soldier a sentence for certain, and he’ll lose his mind or start weeping. Who ever said human nature could bear it without going mad? Why such an ugly, vain, unnecessary violation? Maybe there’s a man who has had the sentence read to him, has been allowed to suffer, and has then been told, “Go, you’re forgiven.” That man might be able to tell us something. Christ spoke of this suffering and horror. No, you can’t treat a man like that!’

(tr. R. Pevear and L Volokhonsky)

Let The Market work its magic and the budget will be in balance, unemployment will sink, personal income will rise, the housing crisis will abate, health care will be cheaper and more plentiful, and all the people will have houses and all the students will be able to afford college. I am not paraphrasing here. I am merely condensing two hours of magical thinking into a single sentence. The solution to every problem — every damn one of them — was to rely on The Market for a solution. It was like watching one of those Star Trek episodes where entire societies grow up serving a computer that the people took for a god. To listen to two hours of this was to fall into a kind of cargo cult, insulated in the mountains of some remote country far from here, where everybody sits around all day and looks at a radio, expecting it to speak, and nobody knows how to turn the damn thing on.

And that is how corporate personhood became enshrined in American law.
Because a clerk put it in a caption, which was then treated like a precedent, because the money power was everywhere in the government in those days. Jack Beatty writes, in no little amazement:
Why did the chief justice issue his dictum? Why did he leave it up to Davis to include it in the headnotes? After Waite told him that the Court ‘avoided’ the issue of corporate personhood, why did Davis include it? Why, indeed, did he begin his head-note with it? The opinion made plain that the Court did not decide the corporate personality issue and the subsidiary equal protection issue.
And it just sat there in the law like undigested beef for more than a century. Hugo Black took a whack at it in 1938, and so did William O. Douglas in 1949. But there it stayed, a baroque and ludicrous concept, until the current Supreme Court activated it and turned it loose on our politics.

“I’ve gone to credit consultants (one of them actually said ‘Well, you could move to Mexico but, they’d probably find you.’) I can’t afford a lawyer or an accountant (I have a job, I’m WAY too far over the poverty line to get state help )… and honestly, what pro-bono lawyer wants to take on a giant student loan company? Come on.” (via Obama’s Student Loan Plan Guide)

The taxpayers are putting up the money and absorbing the losses, but the shareholders are making out like bandits. Bloomberg recently reported that in fiscal year 2009, the University of Phoenix reaped nearly $3.8 billion in revenue, and 86% of it came from the U.S. Department of Education.

The first thing Jean-Luc Godard does is light up a cigar. The nervous-looking event organizer jumps on stage and announces that – because of strict non-smoking enforcement in all of France – Mr. Godard will be the only one allowed to smoke. Because he’s Jean-Luc Godard. The room breaks up in collective laughter. There is another equally amusing announcement: Mr. Godard will be on stage for as long as people wish. For as long as there will be questions for him. No limits. (via In the Presence of Jean-Luc Godard (part 1) | Woman with a Movie Camera)

Real Equality At the end of the discussion, after the moderator has announced that the evening has concluded, Godard takes the microphone again and makes one final statement. He talks about a scene that he wanted to put in Film Socialisme, but eventually left out. He wanted the little boy to say, “Why do ‘equality’ and ‘shit’ rhyme?” But this would have gone too far, he thought. Too bad. Godard goes on to explain, “Whether you are Nicolas Sarkozy or Madame Bettencourt, rich or poor, there is one unique moment in people’s lives that serves as a great equalizer. It’s not when we talk or hear or eat or love. It’s when we have a bowel movement. It’s the moment when we are all sitting on a throne. Equality is right then and there. And we find something that is tragedy and democracy. Real equality. But if that’s the only place where it happens, it’s quite tragic.” (via In the Presence of Jean-Luc Godard (part 2) | Woman with a Movie Camera)